What Is the Anchoring Bias? Definition, Examples and How to Avoid It
The first number on the table quietly pulls every later estimate toward it, even when everyone knows it's arbitrary. Here's how anchoring works and how to keep it from steering your decisions.
In this article
- What is the anchoring bias?
- Where the research comes from
- Why does anchoring happen?
- Adjustment is lazy
- The anchor primes related information
- We treat first information as informative
- Everyday examples
- Pricing
- Salary negotiation
- Estimates and forecasts
- Medical and professional judgement
- Everyday decisions
- How to reduce the pull of anchors
- 1. Form your own estimate first
- 2. Consider the opposite
- 3. Look for several independent reference points
- 4. Make the first offer yourself in a negotiation, when you can
- 5. Slow down on decisions that matter
- 6. Separate the number from the story around it
- A worked example
- Common mistakes
- Frequently asked questions
- What is a simple example of the anchoring bias?
- Does anchoring work even if you know about it?
- How is anchoring different from confirmation bias?
- How does anchoring affect negotiations?
- How can I avoid anchoring when shopping?
- Is the anchoring bias always bad?
- The bottom line
Key takeaways
- Anchoring is the tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information encountered when making an estimate or decision.
- It works even when the anchor is obviously irrelevant, and even when people know it is, which is what makes it so persistent.
- It shapes salary negotiations, prices, estimates, medical judgements and everyday choices, often without anyone noticing.
- Making your own estimate before seeing a number, and deliberately considering the opposite, are the most reliable ways to reduce its pull.
A jacket in a shop window is marked down from $400 to $200, and $200 suddenly feels like a bargain. Later you find out the jacket was never really worth more than $150. The $400 did its work before you had a chance to evaluate anything.
That quiet pull is the anchoring bias, one of the most reliably reproduced findings in judgement and decision-making, and one that shapes prices, salaries, estimates and even medical judgements.
What is the anchoring bias?
The anchoring bias is the tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information we encounter, the anchor, when making a later estimate or decision. We adjust away from the anchor, but usually not far enough, so the final judgement stays closer to it than the facts justify.
Where the research comes from
The effect was described by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman in their 1974 paper on judgement under uncertainty. In one well-known set of experiments, participants spun a wheel that was rigged to land on either 10 or 65, then estimated the percentage of African countries in the United Nations. Those who saw the higher number gave noticeably higher estimates, even though the wheel was obviously random.
Later studies went further. In a widely cited experiment, people were asked to write down the last two digits of their social security number and then bid on items such as wine and chocolate. Those with higher digits bid significantly more. The number was irrelevant, and the effect still held.
Why does anchoring happen?
Adjustment is lazy
We start from the anchor and move toward a plausible answer, but we tend to stop as soon as the answer feels acceptable, which is usually before we’ve travelled far enough.
The anchor primes related information
Seeing a high number makes information that supports a high value more available to the mind, and low numbers do the opposite. This overlaps with the availability heuristic: what comes to mind first shapes what we think is typical.
We treat first information as informative
Even when we suspect an anchor is arbitrary, the mind tends to give it a little weight, assuming someone must have had a reason for the number.
Everyday examples
Anchors often travel with other shortcuts, such as the halo effect, where one good impression colours everything after it, and the mere-exposure effect, where familiarity quietly breeds preference.
Pricing
A “was $400, now $200” tag, a high-priced item beside the one you’re meant to buy, or a restaurant menu that opens with an expensive dish all use anchors to make the next price feel reasonable.
Salary negotiation
Studies on negotiation find that the first offer on the table often acts as a reference point for everything that follows, which is why who names the first number can matter so much.
Estimates and forecasts
A project’s first time estimate, even a rough guess, tends to stick, and later estimates cluster around it regardless of new information.
Medical and professional judgement
Experts are not immune. A first impression of a case or a first suspected diagnosis can pull later reasoning toward it, much like confirmation bias reinforcing the first idea.
Everyday decisions
A friend’s first guess at how long a trip will take, a quoted renovation price, a rent figure from the first apartment you view: each becomes a yardstick for everything that comes next.
How to reduce the pull of anchors
1. Form your own estimate first
Before seeing a price, an offer or someone’s guess, decide what you think the answer is. A prior estimate gives you something to compare against, rather than letting the first number define the range.
2. Consider the opposite
Deliberately ask why the true value might be much higher or much lower than the anchor. Research on debiasing finds that generating reasons the anchor could be wrong reduces its effect.
3. Look for several independent reference points
Compare multiple prices, offers or estimates from different sources rather than evaluating a single number in isolation.
4. Make the first offer yourself in a negotiation, when you can
Because the first number often sets the range, anchoring first, with a reasoned figure, can shift the discussion your way.
5. Slow down on decisions that matter
Anchoring thrives on speed. Taking a night, or at least a few minutes, before agreeing to a price or a plan gives adjustment time to work.
6. Separate the number from the story around it
Ask: If I had never seen that first figure, what would I think this is worth? The question strips away the anchor’s framing.
A worked example
Sam is shown a flat with an asking price of £450,000 and starts to feel that £420,000 would be a good deal.
- Anchoring in action: the asking price has quietly set Sam’s sense of what the flat should cost.
- Correction: Sam first looks at recent sales of three similar flats nearby, all around £390,000.
- Result: with an independent reference point, Sam makes an offer based on comparable sales rather than the asking figure.
Common mistakes
- Assuming an anchor only works if you believe it. It works even when you know it’s arbitrary.
- Evaluating a price in isolation. Without other reference points, the first one dominates.
- Believing experts are immune. Professionals anchor too, especially on first impressions.
- Letting the other side name the first number by default. Preparing your own range first protects you.
- Treating the bias as only a shopping problem. It shapes time estimates, salaries and judgements about people.
Frequently asked questions
What is a simple example of the anchoring bias?
Seeing a jacket marked down from $400 to $200 and feeling that $200 is a bargain, even if the jacket was never worth $400.
Does anchoring work even if you know about it?
Often yes. Studies find that people who are aware of the effect still show it, though deliberate strategies can reduce it.
How is anchoring different from confirmation bias?
Anchoring is about a starting number pulling later estimates toward it. Confirmation bias is about favouring information that agrees with what we already believe.
How does anchoring affect negotiations?
The first offer often becomes a reference point, so the final figure tends to land closer to it than it otherwise would.
How can I avoid anchoring when shopping?
Decide what you think something is worth before you see the price, and compare several independent prices.
Is the anchoring bias always bad?
Not always, since quick reference points save effort. It becomes a problem when the anchor is arbitrary and the stakes are real.
The bottom line
The first number you hear quietly pulls every later judgement toward it, even when you know it shouldn’t. Form your own estimate before seeing a figure, consider why the real value might be far from the anchor and compare several independent reference points before you decide.
References & sources
- Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases . Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131, 1974.
- Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences . The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 73–106, 2003.
- Playing the anchor: Negotiation and the anchoring effect . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2001.
- Thinking, Fast and Slow . Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
This article is for general information and education. It is not medical advice and cannot replace care from a qualified professional. Read our disclaimer.
Related reading
What Is Confirmation Bias? Definition, Examples and How to Overcome It
We rarely weigh evidence neutrally. Confirmation bias quietly steers what we notice, remember and believe. Here is how it works, where it shows up, and how to check yourself.
What Is the Availability Heuristic? Definition, Examples and Fixes
If a memory comes to mind easily, we assume it must be common or important, even when it isn't. The availability heuristic quietly shapes fears, decisions and judgements of risk.
What Is the Sunk Cost Fallacy? Definition, Examples and How to Avoid It
You've already put in months, or dollars, or years, so quitting feels like a waste. The sunk cost fallacy convinces us that past investment should decide the future. Here's how to see past it.
More in Psychology
All Psychology →Editor’s picks
The Clear Mind letter
One considered essay, now and then.
No streaks, no urgency. A short note when we publish something worth your attention.